Avoid Confusion
In analyzing and understanding work and managing. Three other common confusions are dealt with here.
in this section, especially complex work or work within formal organizations, it is necessary to be clear about terms. The most ordinary terms can be particularly confusing: e.g.An Outcome & An Output
«Ouputs» are tangible. Any actual output is also an actual outcome of some sort. «Outcome» in this context is a synonym for result i.e. some change in the real world.
However, in
we are concerned with bringing certain changes about i.e. with desired outcomes. And not all «desired outcomes» are outputs, rather they are a consequence of outputs.A desired outcome (assuming it is feasible in principle) is a
, specifically a .An outcome depends on appropriate outputs, sometimes all very similar, but the connection may not be direct. In large projects or organizations, both outcomes and outputs may be diverse and complex.
Examples:
Re Control
Outputs can be controlled: they can be specified in great detail and their production can be closely supervised and checked.
Outcomes cannot be controlled in the same way: because outputs may not have the expected effect and disruptive events may intrude and render them useless or even counter-productive.
An Activity & An Action
An activity and an action are two different things i.e. activity is not just a plurality of actions.
An activity is used here as a category or class of actions of a particular sort.
Examples:
Activities are
and their identity is defined byActions are the final common pathway of all purposes, and occur in work within tasks that are defined by
Projects and organizations typically require diverse and more or less specialized activities, but not vast numbers. However,
are generated by and these occur continuously. Even a simple task will include dozens, hundreds or even thousands of actions. However, for simplicity, we often use the singular (e.g. «take action») when we mean commit to the flow of actions required by a task.Re Control
You can directly control activities in various ways e.g. you may increase their significance, their scope, their sophistication. So activities are manageable.
You cannot control actions directly in the same way. Actions are performed by persons and are a basic expression of human freedom and creative judgement. Interfering with or micro-managing actions reduces the person to helpless frustration. (You can only control actions indirectly through specifying tasks and
in ever more minute detail.)Strategic Objective & Strategy
specify desirable feasible outcomes: are singular or plural outcomes, while strategies are sets or systems of subsidiary outcomes.
The
is a primary outcome of activity in a social situation. It is always a challenge to define specific appropriate and feasible outcomes.When situations are complex, interactive and dynamic—typical in large enterprises, it is difficult to ensure activities will generate the desired outcome.
is a set of inter-connected (sub-)outcomes that, together, are judged to be likely to produce the . It is always a challenge to develop a viable strategy. ) than as an outcome ( ). Even specifying «growth» as an objective is vague.
Conclusion
- A manager needs to manage activities and tasks to produce outputs that embody or lead to desired outcomes.
- A worker needs expertise in a particular activity, and makes decisions and takes actions either in response to being managed or as part of managing.
- In a dynamic situation, everyone needs a strategy to deliver the desired outcome.
Clear?
- Now return to your options for the next step.
Originally posted:5-Nov-2013